Stephan: The Dust Bowl of the 1930s changed the course of American history and created a mass internal migration. It is beginning to look like it is going to happen again. Here is the report.
A new study shows dust storms have become more common and more severe on the Great Plains, leading some to wonder if the United States is headed for another Dust Bowl, reports Roland Pease for Science. With nearly half the country currently in drought and a winter forecast predicting continued dry weather for many of the afflicted regions, dust storms could become an even bigger threat.
In the 1930s, the Dust Bowl was caused by years of severe drought and featured dust storms up to 1,000 miles long. But the other driving force behind the plumes of dust that ravaged the landscape was the conversion of prairie to agricultural fields on a massive scale—between 1925 and the early 1930s, farmers converted 5.2 million acres of grassland over to farming, reported Sarah Zielinski for Smithsonian magazine in 2012.
Hardy prairie grasses would have likely withstood the drought, but crops covering the newly converted tracts swiftly bit the […]
Stephan: I find this almost unbelievable. How can men and women who take an oath to "support and defend the Constitution," a document designed to foster wellbeing so callously walk away, doing nothing to alleviate the misery of millions? What kind of person does that? And what does that tell you about the future of America if these people stay in power?
After installing right-wing judge Amy Coney Barrett on the Supreme Court just days ahead of the November presidential election, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell summarily adjourned his chamber for recess late Monday without approving any additional coronavirus relief, effectively signaling that the prospect of an aid package ahead of next week’s contest is dead.
“The Republican Senate can move incredibly fast when they think something is important. They just didn’t think Covid relief was important.” —Leah Greenberg, Indivisible
While House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin are set to continue negotiating the details of a roughly $2 trillion relief package as economic suffering intensifies nationwide, the Republican-controlled Senate’s departure late Monday appeared to confirm that McConnell—who has been one of the primary obstacles to additional stimulus legislation—has no interest in passing a bill before November 3.
When the Senate returns on November 9, nearly a week after the election, its first scheduled vote is on a procedural […]
Stephan: If you owe a man or a company hundreds of millions of dollars do you think that he or it may have some power over you? Would you find it hard to say no to something he or it asked? We have a president who owes sums so great most people cannot even conceptualize them. How unsuccessful as a business man do you have to be to be that far in debt? Do you think that is a good thing? Is that good for the country?
The 2020 election may be President Donald Trump’s last attempt to dodge the consequences he could face for the staggering amount of debt that will come due over the next four years.
Ever since The New York Times’ bombshell report about Trump’s taxes, there has been heightened speculation about the president’s debt and who he owes. Now, the Financial Times is shedding light on the illusion of Trump’s windfall. The publication reports that Trump has more than $1.1 billion in debt and much of the debt is owed to creditors and banks.
In most cases, the president has used real estate —mostly linked to a small number of buildings and golf courses that form the core of the Trump business empire, according to the publication— as collateral to secure the loans. It has been reported that approximately $900 million of the $1.1 billion debt will come due at some point during Trump’s second term if he wins the election.
According to the publication’s graph, Trump’s debts are broken down into five categories:
Vornado Realty Trust: $447 million owed as part of a […]
Stephan: When one looks at the demographics, it is obvious that Trump's most solid base is resentful angry White men of modest means and education. They are the enduring manifestation of Abrahamic thinking with its conviction that men are superior to women, and humans have dominion over the earth and, to them, Trump is their model of manliness. It is a dying model, but one that is still capable of doing great harm.
This election will test the country’s core.
Who are we? How did we come to this? How did this country elect Donald Trump and does it have the collective constitution to admit the error and reverse it?
At the moment, Joe Biden is leading in the polls, but the fact that Trump is even close — and still has a chance, however slim, to be re-elected — is for a person like me, a Black man, astounding. I assume that there are many women, Muslims, immigrants, Mexicans and people from Haiti and African nations he disparaged who feel the same way.
Trump is the president of the United States because a majority of white people in this country wanted him to be. Perhaps some supported him despite his obvious flaws, but others undoubtedly saw those flaws as laudable attributes. For the latter, Trump’s racism was welcome in the coven.
Still, according to the latest Quinnipiac poll, more white people support Trump than Biden. This is primarily a function of white men who prefer […]
Stephan: When you lack ethics and honor, and all you care about is power, and you are in a position of authority, this is the kind of person you put on the bench. This is what the Republican Party has been doing for several decades now to the American judiciary, and unless Biden is elected and clears the various levels of the courts of these incompetents and ideologues America's once-vaunted legal system will become a charade
With the confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett, the radical right has completed its long and painstaking project to seize control of the Supreme Court, and to reshape constitutional law for generations to come. Barrett’s elevation will give conservatives a 6-3 majority on the court and usher in a crisis of legitimacy for the third branch of government not seen since the 1930s.
Enlarging the Supreme Court is entirely within the power of Congress, as the number of justices is not set by the Constitution. The court’s composition has, in fact, varied over time, ranging from six justices when the Constitution was ratified to 10 in 1863. The panel […]