The Republican’s Magical Mystery Tour (Starting Next Week)

Stephan:  Robert Reich is dead on in this essay. I think he has made a very realistic fact-based assessment of the new Congress. If things run true to form we are going to have a very rough two years. Wellness will hardly be discussed. And if the Republicans do enough serious damage to the economy it will take years more to heal it. Tighten your seat belt.

Robert Reich, Goldman School of Public Policy, UC BerkeleyAccording to reports, one of the first acts of the Republican congress will be to fire Doug Elmendorf, current director of the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, because he won’t use “dynamic scoring” for his economic projections.

Dynamic scoring is the magical-mystery math Republicans have been pushing since they came up with supply-side “trickle-down” economics.

It’s based on the belief that cutting taxes unleashes economic growth and thereby produces additional government revenue. Supposedly the added revenue more than makes up for what’s lost when Congress hands out the tax cuts.

Dynamic scoring would make it easier to enact tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations, because the tax cuts wouldn’t look as if they increased the budget deficit.

Incoming House Ways and Means Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) calls it “reality-based scoring,” but it’s actually magical scoring – which is why Elmendorf, as well as all previous CBO directors have rejected it.

Few economic theories have been as thoroughly tested in the real world as supply-side economics, and so notoriously failed.

Ronald Reagan cut the […]

Read the Full Article

1 Comment

The Intelligent Plant

Stephan:  This report is a mixed bag. It has so much physicalist attitude that I almost didn't use it.  I knew Chris Bird, Peter Tompkins and Cleve Backster very well and for many years, and the point they were really trying to make is that plants have consciousness. As the report describes this assertion created a firestorm in biology in the early 70s, and now research seems to support them. The idea is not do plants have awareness but how to interpret that. This piece is an excellent representation of the physicalist consciousness denier position. But it also gives a pretty good description of the relevant issues and state of research -- which is what decided me.  The Tompkins Bird deeper insight that we live embedded in a matrix of life is also correct. The essay describes the phenomenon without dealing with the implications. In fact, my major take away from this lengthy essay is that for those scientists unable to conceive of nonlocal non brain-based consciousness the world is an awkward and confusing place. There are all these phenomena observed in studies that simply cannot be subsumed under the physicalist paradigm.
Credit: workplacecoachblog.com

Credit: workplacecoachblog.com

In 1973, a book claiming that plants were sentient beings that feel emotions, prefer classical music to rock and roll, and can respond to the unspoken thoughts of humans hundreds of miles away landed on the New York Times best-seller list for nonfiction. “The Secret Life of Plants,” by Peter Tompkins and Christopher Bird, presented a beguiling mashup of legitimate plant science, quack experiments, and mystical nature worship that captured the public imagination at a time when New Age thinking was seeping into the mainstream. The most memorable passages described the experiments of a former C.I.A. polygraph expert named Cleve Backster, who, in 1966, on a whim, hooked up a galvanometer to the leaf of a dracaena, a houseplant that he kept in his office. To his astonishment, Backster found that simply by imagining the dracaena being set on fire he could make it rouse the needle of the polygraph machine, registering a surge of electrical activity suggesting that the plant felt stress. “Could the plant […]

Read the Full Article

1 Comment

The Countries Where It’s Best And Worst To Be A Woman

Stephan:  You have read many times in SR or the Explore essays that I believe one of the key meta-trends is gender equality. Here is an accurate report on how this is playing out across the world. Note that the U.S. is not one of the best countries for women. Not even in the top five. If you are an American woman is that o.k. with you? For the actual Gender Index report.
Credit: examiner.com

Credit: examiner.com

Discrimination against women and girls isn’t just a moral issue: It also carries a high economic cost.

There’s an obvious moral case for promoting gender equality around the world, but there’s also an economic one. Countries that give opportunities to girls and women tend to do better economically, while those that don’t do less well. Almost all the least well-off countries in the world rank poorly for gender equality, because, as a new report puts it, “discrimination against women and girls carries a high development cost.”

The best countries for women:

 

Belgium
France
Slovenia
Spain
Serbia

The OECD Development Center‘s new Social Institutions and Gender Index looks at the “underlying structural barriers that deny women’s rights and their access to justice, resources and empowerment opportunities.” It’s based on data from 160 countries and covers “social norms, practices and laws”—like the age at which girls can legally marry, the level of “son bias” (where families deliberately push […]

Read the Full Article

No Comments

Near death, explained

Stephan:  Here is an excellent survey piece on Near Death, and the survival of consciousness. Mario Beauregard is a well respected researcher in the consciousness research community, and he has brought together many of the major developments addressing the final transition.  If you wish to pursue this topic the book I recommend is Dutch cardiologist Pim van Lommell's book, Consciousness Beyond Life. I have not read it yet but, on the basis of past papers, I expect Beauregard's new book to be a winner as well. This essay was adapted from the book - “The Brain Wars: The Scientific Battle Over the Existence of the Mind and the Proof That Will Change the Way We Live Our Lives.” Courtesy of the publisher HarperOne.
Credit: Shutterstock

Credit: Shutterstock

In 1991, Atlanta-based singer and songwriter Pam Reynolds felt extremely dizzy, lost her ability to speak, and had difficulty moving her body. A CAT scan showed that she had a giant artery aneurysm—a grossly swollen blood vessel in the wall of her basilar artery, close to the brain stem. If it burst, which could happen at any moment, it would kill her. But the standard surgery to drain and repair it might kill her too.

With no other options, Pam turned to a last, desperate measure offered by neurosurgeon Robert Spetzler at the Barrow Neurological Institute in Phoenix, Arizona. Dr. Spetzler was a specialist and pioneer in hypothermic cardiac arrest—a daring surgical procedure nicknamed “Operation Standstill.” Spetzler would bring Pam’s body down to a temperature so low that she was essentially dead. Her brain would not function, but it would be able to survive longer without oxygen at this temperature. The low temperature would also soften the swollen blood vessels, allowing them to be operated on with less risk of bursting. When the […]

Read the Full Article

1 Comment

“We will need writers who can remember freedom”: Ursula K Le Guin at the National Book Awards

Stephan:  Ursula Le Guin, the daughter of one of the founders of American anthropology, has influenced two generations of writers and thinkers -- myself included. This is a transcript of a speech she gave at the National Book Awards dinner. It raises issues that should be of concern to every American, indeed every citizen of whatever nation.

Ursula K. Le Guin was honored at the National Book Awards tonight and gave a fantastic speech about the dangers to literature and how they can be stopped. As far as I know it’s not available online yet (update: the video is now online), so I’ve transcribed it from the livestream below. The parts in parentheses were ad-libbed directly to the audience, and the Neil thanked is Neil Gaiman, who presented her with the award.

Thank you Neil, and to the givers of this beautiful reward, my thanks from the heart. My family, my agent, editors, know that my being here is their doing as well as mine, and that the beautiful reward is theirs as much as mine. And I rejoice at accepting it for, and sharing it with, all the writers who were excluded from literature for so long, my fellow authors of fantasy and science fiction—writers of the imagination, who for the last 50 years watched the beautiful rewards go to the so-called realists.

I think hard times are coming when we will be wanting the voices of writers who can see alternatives to how we live now and can see through our fear-stricken society and its obsessive […]

Read the Full Article

3 Comments